Showing posts with label Asset Allocation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Asset Allocation. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2011

Brokerages next big threat? Portfolios-to-go - InvestmentNews

http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20110408/FREE/110409923

Brokerages next big threat? Portfolios-to-go

Some say cheap, prepackaged investment models could do to financial advisers what Expedia did to travel agents
 
April 8, 2011 7:30 am ET
 
Andy Cohen, 47, uses exchange-traded fund portfolios recommended by MarketRiders Inc. to manage his retirement plan and children's college savings. He's charged about $10 a month.
“I don't have enough money that I have a dedicated wealth manager,” said Cohen, who lives in San Mateo, California, and is chief executive officer of Caring.com, which offers resources for children helping aging parents. “It got me a much more diversified portfolio than I could have ever done on my own.”The next thundering herd on Wall Street may be the ranks of low-cost portfolio managers such as MarketRiders and Folio Investing, which cater to self-directed investors like Cohen. Sites that sell prepackaged portfolios have attracted more than $3 billion in assets over the last three years as more investors leave their full-service brokers.“Individual investors have started to realize they can actually do some things as self-directed investors reasonably well, if they're given a platform that allows them to invest more intelligently,” said Steven Wallman, chief executive officer of Folio Investing, where investors can purchase predesigned and customized index portfolios for $29 a month.Some of the firms, such as Flat Fee Portfolios, are too new to have any performance history. MarketRiders can't track the actual performance of its customers' accounts, since it doesn't have custody of their assets. Covestor and Wealthfront Inc., which give users access to third-party investors, publish performance history for the managers they work with on their sites.“Who are the people that are advising me when I'm going to a faceless website?” said Chris Walters, head of wealth management for Pasadena, California-based CitizensTrust. He said investors should be concerned by the lack of performance history available from some of the firms. Losing ClientsBank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, the top two full-service brokerages by client assets, had combined outflows of about $150 billion during 2009, the most recent year for which data is available, and about 10,600 financial advisers left the firms that year, according to Aite Group, a Boston-based research firm. Merrill Lynch hasn't seen a trend of investors leaving the broker, said Selena Morris, a spokeswoman for the bank.“The number one source of accounts is what we would refer to as full-commission brokers,” said Peter Sidebottom, executive vice president of product, marketing and client experience for Omaha, Nebraska-based TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., which caters to do-it-yourself investors.'Wolfgang Puck Express'Traditional brokerages are focusing more on their wealthiest clients in an effort to improve profitability, so the customers leaving these firms tend to be the ones with the smallest accounts, said Katharine Wolf, senior analyst for Cerulli Associates, a Boston-based research firm.“They're not looking to target a client that has, say, under $250,000 to invest,” she said.Those investors are potential customers for services such as Flat Fee Portfolios, which began opening accounts in February. Clients with assets of less than $250,000 are offered several predesigned portfolios with an annual review for a fee of $129 a month.It's the “Wolfgang Puck Express” of portfolio management, said Mark Cortazzo, founder of Flat Fee Portfolios, referring to the celebrity chef who sells gourmet dishes for low prices at his fast-food restaurants. The portfolios are managed by Macro Consulting Group in Parsippany, New Jersey.“It's for people who want good quality asset management,” at a price that is “accessible to a much wider demographic,” he said. The firm charges $199 a month and provides semiannual reviews for accounts with at least $250,000.Lack of ControlAt Hedgeable Inc., investors can choose from among 20 different exchange-traded fund or stock model portfolios. Fees for the service, which began opening accounts through its website in December, range from 0.75 percent to 1.5 percent. Investors like the transparency of the Web-based business models, said Mike Kane, founder of the New York-based firm.“Traditionally in the investment advisory world you hand over to your adviser say $100,000, and they invest it how they see fit. You meet with them once a quarter or once a year and you really don't have any control beyond that,” Kane said. Hedgeable investors can view up-to-date account information including transactions and holdings on their mobile phones, he said.E-Mail ExchangeSome of the services leave investors in control of their assets and others take discretionary authority over client accounts. With Flat Fee Portfolios, managers have discretion over client assets. MarketRiders gives advice on investment decisions, such as rebalancing, and investors may then choose whether to apply it to their own brokerage accounts. Other than Folio Investing, which is a broker-dealer, all of the firms are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as investment advisers.“The beauty of it for me is that monthly e-mail that just says ‘Here's how to do it,'” said Cohen, who has been using MarketRiders for about two years. “If I didn't get that e-mail I'd never do it.”Prepackaged portfolios from Folio Investing may contain individual stocks, mutual funds or exchange-traded funds. The McLean, Virginia-based company's moderate portfolio for investors planning on retiring in 2040 is composed of 10 exchange-traded funds and notes that track stocks, real-estate investment trusts and commodities, including the PowerShares QQQ fund, which follows the Nasdaq-100 stock index.That portfolio returned 3 percent annualized over the three years to April 6, compared with average returns of 1.3 percent for 2040 target-date mutual funds, according to Folio Investing and Morningstar data.Hedge FundCovestor, which began managing money in November 2009, tracks the portfolios of about 30,000 users who choose to make their investment actions viewable to others on the site, and users may have their accounts track the trades of about 150 pre- screened managers on the site.“It's like an open-source hedge fund,” said Perry Blacher, chief executive officer of London-based Covestor. Some of the managers on the Covestor site are professional investment advisers registered with the SEC and some aren't. The managers range from Atlas Capital Advisors, a San Francisco-based registered investment adviser that manages $175 million for high-net-worth investors, to “an ophthalmologist in Wisconsin,” Blacher said.Global Reach“Investors should always be very careful to check out the people providing investment advice,” said Patricia Struck, administrator for the division of securities of the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, “especially when what they're giving you is not tailored to your needs.” SEC spokeswoman Florence Harmon declined to comment on the Covestor business model.These sites don't represent a competitive threat to traditional brokerages, said Jim Wiggins, a spokesman for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.“People don't come to Morgan Stanley Smith Barney for discount trading,” he said. “They come for professional money management and to access some of the products and services that are only available through a global investment bank.” He declined to provide the range of fees full-service brokerage customers pay.‘Cookie-Cutter Approach'MarketRiders, based in Palo Alto, California, has $2.7 billion in user portfolios. Traditional brokerages had about $4.7 trillion in assets under management at the end of 2009 and account for about 38 percent of all U.S. wealth-management assets, according to Aite data. Folio Investing, which is closely held, has “multiple billions” invested, said Wallman, who wouldn't provide a specific figure. Covestor's Blacher, who wouldn't disclose assets, said the company is gaining about 15 percent in assets each month.“I have yet to see a cookie-cutter approach that is as appropriate as a customized approach, and that's what you give up when you go to one of these types of services,” said Walters of CitizensTrust, which is the wealth-management division of Ontario, Canada-based Citizens Business Bank. Walters's firm has an average client account size of $4 million. Wealthfront Inc., which started in October 2009, lets users invest as little as $10,000 among 40 different registered investment advisers who normally have account minimums of $1 million. The firm has about $180 million in assets invested through its site.Mass Management“We're trying to deliver institutional-class asset management to the masses,” said Andy Rachleff, chief executive officer of Palo Alto, California-based Wealthfront. He said the firm chooses investment managers to participate the same way endowments do, by examining managers' historical trade details rather than just their performance history. Rachleff is the vice chairman of the University of Pennsylvania's endowment investment committee.Wealthfront managers have returned an average of 30 percent from the site's start in October 2009 through Feb. 18, compared with a 27 percent gain in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. The managers charge average fees of 1.3 percent.Richard Ferri, founder of Troy, Michigan-based Portfolio Solutions, builds index fund and exchange-traded fund portfolios for clients and rebalances them periodically for a fee of 25 basis points. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point. Rebalancing during times of market turmoil may add about one percentage point to returns annually, he said. The firm has almost $1 billion in assets under management.Saving MoneyInvestors could save more money on their investments and improve their returns by skipping services such as MarketRiders and making decisions themselves, said Burton Malkiel, professor of economics at Princeton University and author of “A Random Walk Down Wall Street.” The 10th edition of the book was published in January.He recommends investors hold a mix of the Vanguard Total World Stock Index exchange-traded fund and a broad-market bond exchange-traded fund such as the iShares Barclays Aggregate Bond Fund or the Vanguard Total Bond Market exchange-traded fund, and rebalance annually.“I don't want to pay 25 basis points to anybody to do that for me,” said Malkiel.--Bloomberg News--

Monday, June 14, 2010

Counterintuitive Asset Allocation

WSJ Blogs- http://blogs.wsj.com/financial-adviser/2010/06/14/voices-chris-walters-on-counterintuitive-asset-allocation/

VOICES: Chris Walters, On Counterintuitive Asset Allocation


In theory, wealth advisers thoroughly interview clients before creating a strategic asset allocation, in order to ensure the resulting asset mix corresponds to a client’s financial goals and risk preferences. But I recently reviewed a number of asset allocations that were appropriate from an age perspective but questionable from a standpoint of the clients’ situation or inclinations.

Take the case of a couple in their early eighties with no heirs; he a retired economist, she a former university professor. Ordinarily, older investors are advised to maintain a relatively modest risk in their portfolio. However, this couple was confident that they had more money than they could ever spend, and did not require significant investment income. Their goal was to build as large an investment portfolio as possible to bequeath to a charity. They understood that this entailed assuming greater risk, but felt that if their $5 million portfolio lost even half its value, their quality of life would not be endangered.

The upside of assuming greater risk was that their favored charity might ultimately receive a larger bequest. The couple was willing to take that chance. Our team helped the couple create an investment portfolio diversified across a range of equities and other risk assets, with only a small allocation to fixed income.

Another example of counter-intuitive asset allocation is a 38-year-old man who had $15 million in investable assets due to the sale of a family business, and was looking for a new entrepreneurial opportunity. On previous advice, he had $15-million spread across a 70-30 blend of equities to fixed income, assuming that this allocation was appropriate based on his age. I observed that this would be appropriate for most people below the age of 40, but asked the young man to consider what might happen in the case of a severe market downturn.

I also pointed out that since he was intent upon assuming a high level of risk in a new entrepreneurial endeavor, it didn’t make sense for him to take on relatively high risk in both his investment portfolio and his new initiative. My team constructed a portfolio that contained risk assets, including hedge funds, but had ample fixed-income exposure and liquidity.

Then there was the couple, in their early sixties, with financial assets of $2.2 million spread across a 401(k) account and personal savings. They planned to retire in four years. Their aggregated asset allocation was divided almost equally between equities and fixed income, in order to help ensure that their assets could offset the impact of inflation over a lifespan that might extend another two or three decades.

However, the couple was concerned that the cash stream produced by this asset allocation, along with Social Security, would not generate the level of income they desired. They were also apprehensive that a significant equities market downturn at this point in their life would leave them with even less ability to generate income.